Boards & Managers
Multi-court complexes delivered with permit packages, HOA review docs, and phased build schedules already handled.
What Goes Wrong
Most delays and cost overruns trace back to documentation gaps and skipped site checks, not the construction itself.
Builders who skip the permit package cause stop-work orders that can delay a project by months and add re-inspection fees.
The correct county jurisdiction rules are confirmed during scoping, and the full permit application is assembled before construction is scheduled.
Submitting incomplete architectural review packets forces boards into multiple revision cycles and delays community approval by weeks.
HOA design review documentation is prepared in the same scoping phase as the permit package, so both submissions go out together.
A single-line quote gives boards no way to approve phases independently or track spend against the agreed scope as work progresses.
The written estimate breaks earthwork, sub-base, surface pour, acrylic coating, fencing, and lighting into separate cost categories for staged approval.
Without a written record of the finished scope, schools and HOAs have no baseline for warranty claims or future maintenance budgeting.
A final walkthrough confirms slope, drainage, and line marking meet spec, and a written completion record is handed to the board or facilities manager.
Scope of Work
From a single HOA court to a multi-court school complex, the scope includes every stage from permit filing to final sign-off.
Multi-court layouts built to HOA architectural committee specs, with design review packets prepared during the scoping phase.
Regulation-marked courts for schools and recreation departments, sized and surfaced to meet county building department requirements.
Large complexes broken into separately approved phases so boards can manage budget cycles without halting the full project.
Permit applications assembled for Chesterfield, Henrico, and Goochland counties before any construction date is confirmed.
Sport-specific color layouts applied after surface cure.
Chain-link or welded-wire fencing with pole lighting packages.
Court lines marked to USTA, USAPA, or NCAA dimensions.
Surface slope and perimeter drainage designed to county spec.
Why Choose Us
Community court projects carry more documentation and stakeholder accountability than a backyard build. Here is what that means in practice.
Every project starts with a site visit to assess drainage and access before a single cost is put in writing.
The written estimate lists base prep, surfacing, fencing, lighting, and line marking as individual costs boards can review and approve.
We handle Chesterfield, Henrico, and Goochland permit applications, so the correct rules are applied from the first submission.
Architectural review packets are prepared during scoping, not added later, so committee submissions go out on the project’s first timeline.
Sign-off requires a confirmed walkthrough, and boards receive a written record of the finished scope for maintenance and warranty use.
The Process
01
We arrange an on-site visit to assess drainage, soil conditions, and access before scoping any work or costs.
02
The permit package, HOA review documents, and itemised phased estimate are prepared together and submitted before construction is scheduled.
03
Construction follows the approved phase schedule, ending with a walkthrough and a written completion record handed to the board.
Pricing Estimates
| Job | Typical cost |
|---|---|
| Small community court | $40,000-$75,000 |
| HOA amenity court | $60,000-$120,000 |
| School or larger commercial court | $100,000-$250,000 |
Share the location and intended use, and we’ll arrange an on-site evaluation with a written estimate covering every cost category.